Parents Keep Child s Gender Secret By Jayme Poisson

In â€Å"Parents Keep Child’s Gender Secret,† Jayme Poisson describes how one family choses to raise their child genderless. They are also keeping the child’s sex a secret, although it is not clear if they are trying to allow the child to define its sex. Gender and sex are two different distinctions that are often mistakenly seen as the same thing. Society places gender expectations based on sex, so it’s easy to see why they are looked at as the same thing. It’s important to remember that gender represents a choice, while sex is determined before you are born. The option of choosing is important when considering the ethics of raising a child. It’s why I believe that it is ethical to allow a child to define their gender and unethical to allow a child to define their sex. There are three common arguments against allowing a child to define their gender. The first common argument is that the child will bullied and may not be mature enough to handle it. Unfortunately, children can be bullied for a number of reasons regardless of their gender. Parents do not allow bullying to affect other decisions and they should not allow bullying to interfere with who their child wants to be either. It is he one doing the bullying that has a problem, not their child. The second common argument against allowing a child to define their gender is that friends and family will disapprove. However, there is always someone who will disapprove of any decision you make. Voting, eating meat, sexualShow MoreRelatedGender Secrecy : Sex And Gender1244 Words   |  5 PagesAalap Pandya Valorie Ebert ENC1102-8:00 am 4 September, 2014 Poisson First Draft Gender Secrecy Sex and gender are commonly misconstrued to mean the same thing. Which causes stereotypes and expectations to be created on the idea that they are one. The stereotypes and expectations are as follows; boys should be dirty and aggressive who love action figures and the color blue, who have to grow up and have high status roles in society so they can be successful. Girls, on the other hand, should be delicateRead MoreParent Keep Child s Gender Secret Essay1445 Words   |  6 Pagesdetermines one’s gender and personal lifestyle. While girls are supposed to like ballet and wear pink, boys are supposed to play with trucks and like sports. What people like and what they do is determined by their gender, but most of this assumptions are based on one’s sex. The expectations that society has of how people are supposed to dress and act could be different if their sex was not something to worry about. For instance, Jayme Poisson in her essay â€Å"Parent Keep Child’s Gend er Secret† mentions aRead MoreGender Identity And Its Effect On The Way People1783 Words   |  8 Pagesothers. When it comes to sex and gender, these two words are used interchangeably, even though they are different. Sex is what a person is biologically born with, whereas Gender is how a person is seen in society, their roles, and their accepted behavior. Gender identity is a person’s inner sense of being male or female and a display of that. Jayme Poisson writes an article, â€Å"Parents Keep Child’s Gender Secret,† on two parents that decided to raise their newborn child genderless. The couple also allowsRead MoreGender And Male And Gender1689 Words   |  7 PagesThroughout today s society, almost every aspect of someone’s actions is based on whether or not he or she fits into the social norms that have been created. It is now clear that males are the dominant figures in our society. Norms in society do not just come randomly to one s life; t hey start since a child is born. When a child is born the first question asked by the parents, family, and friends is the gender of the child, whether it is a girl or a boy. In contrast, the terms sex and gender have always

South Africa Free Essays

Sindy Veritus March 9, 2013 Global Studies: Argumentative Essay South African Apartheid Apartheid in South Africa was a system of racial segregation enforced through legislation by the National Party government from 1948 to 1994 of South Africa. Racial segregation in South Africa began in colonial times by the Dutch and British. Apartheid as an official policy was introduced following the general election in 1948. We will write a custom essay sample on South Africa or any similar topic only for you Order Now Apartheid was developed after War World II by the Afrikaner-dominated National Party and was first colonized by the Dutch and then the English came in and took most of it away. The population of South Africa was classified into four groups which was the Black, White, Indian, and Colored. The Colored group included people regarded as being of mixed descent including people of Bantu, and European ancestry and much more. Knowing that Apartheid was a system of laws created to keep the white population in control. The Group Areas act of 1951 controlled people where they could of live. The black where driven far away from their city, although their jobs were still in the cities in the white neighborhood. The Bantu education Act meant that the black students were disadvantaged with their education. â€Å"Bus fares were expensive and catching public transport everyday was expensive and caused hardship and depression for the black people. † (Wikipedia) The apartheid policy was highly effective of achieving its goal of privileged conduct for whites. On the other hand, the white population supported apartheid because they felt it was there to own the land of South Africa. There were many white pro apartheid people because of the much larger population of black South Africans causing the white people to believe that if the black were given rights and freedom, they would of no longer have political power. The white people were worried because they thought that their race would be taken over and they would lose the control that they always had. As a final point, In February 1990 President FW de Klerk announced the release of Nelson Mandela and began the exclusion of the Apartheid system. In 1992 a white council approved the reform process and on April 27, 1994 the first democratic elections were held in South Africa with people of all different races being able to vote. After the Apartheid came to an end in South Africa, people had more freedom. The Africans now have a little more money now that it’s not all going to the white. South Africa is now peaceful and the anniversary of the elections, which was held on April 27, is celebrated as a public holiday in South Africa known as Freedom Day. How to cite South Africa, Essay examples

Types Of Director’s Duties And Breaches †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Types Of Directors Duties And Breaches. Answer: Directors Any person who is appointed to the position of a director or an alternate director is deemed to be a director of the company under section 9 of the Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) CA. The person would be known as a director regardless of whatever name is provided to such position. People were not properly appointed are also included through sections 9 as the directors of the company. According to such provisions person acting in the position of a director are known as De facto directors of a company. In the given situation it has been provided that May and June are two directors of the company clan Limited. Thus as they are made directors through appointment they would be deemed as directors under section 9 of the Corporation Act. Types of directors duties and breaches The directors of a company owe a duty towards it under the commonlaw as well as legislations enacted by the parliament. These duties have been imposed on the directors in order to ensure that the interest of the shareholders and other stakeholders of the company such as its creditors are protected (Keay 2014). In the case of Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) v Cassimatis (No. 8) [2016] FCA 1023 the Court ruled that as the directors were not able to ensure appropriate diligence and care towards discharging the duties in relation to the company they had violated section 180 (1) of the CA. Section 180 of the CA directs the directors of a company to discharge there obligations towards the company through observing care and diligence which would be deployed by a reasonable director under the same position and situation. Section 181 of the CA directs the directors of a company to carry out the activities towards a proper purpose and the best interest of the organisation they are working for. Section 182 of the CA directs the directors of a company to never misuse the position which they hold in the company to make personal profits and cause loss to the company. Section 183 of the CA makes it mandatory for the directors of the company not to use any information with respect to the company which can be accessed by them for making personal profits and causing loss to the company. Under common lawthe directors of the company have a duty to avoid any conflict of interest. Conflict of interest signifies the dispute between the personal interest of the directors and the overall interest of the company (Langford 2015). In case any such situation arises it is the duty of the directors to always prefer and give priority to the interest of the organisation. The commonlaw also provide the duty to deploy due skill and diligence towards operations of the organisation and to act for a proper purpose (Gerner, Paech and Schuster 2013). Section 588 G of the CA directs the directors of a company to stop trading when the company has become insolvent. In addition the section provides that the directors must not carry on any trade activity if a reasonable person under same circumstances would have a belief that the company would become insolvent if the trading is carried on. The directors of the company who indulge insolvent trading and breach the provisions of section 588G are personally liable for any debt incurred by the company due to the insolvent trading. According to the facts of the scenario Mary has violated various directors duties as discussed above. Firstly while not being careful towards making a decision with respect to the new venture Mary has violated the duty of care and diligence imposed on her through commonlaw as well as section 180 of the CA. The fact that whether a decision taken by Mary was with respect to a proper purpose is also in doubt and thus it can be provided that she has violated section 181 of the CA as well as the common law provisions of acting in proper purpose and best interest of the company. She has misuse the position and not acted in good faith and best interest of the company by retaining all the money in relation to the investment which she made into a risky venture. In addition she violated the duty with respect to the conflict of interest as she gave priority to her personal interest and not to the interest of the company. Moreover she has violated section 588 G of the act as she had used the loa n to invest money in a risky venture while the company was not able to pay its creditors. Remedies In case the provisions provided in section 180-183 of the CA are violated, it triggers a civil penalty provisions with respect to Section 1317 E of the CA. The directors of the company are also personally liable for any debt incurred by the company as a result of insolvent trading. Under section 206Cof the CA the directors of the company can also be suspended from managing a corporation for a certain time if they are found to violate the directors greatest duties as provided in the Act. Under section 184 if the directors have been reckless they can also be provided with strict liability provisions Under the Criminal Code. The directors may be asked to pay $200,000 as individuals and $1 million if they are corporation. Conclusions Therefore to the above discussed provisions and the facts of the case it can be concluded that by carrying on the new venture and using the loan to make personal profits while the company was not able to pay its debts, Mary has violated the provisions of the Corporation Act in relation to directors duties as well as the common law duty is imposed on her and is liable to pay damages to the company and be suspended from managing corporations in the future for a certain period. References Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) ASIC v Cassimatis (No. 8) [2016] FCA 1023 Keay, A.R., 2014.Directors' Duties. Jordans. Keay, A.R., 2014. Directors' duties and creditors' interests.The Law Quarterly Review,130(Jul), pp.443-472. Langford, R.T., 2015. Directors' Duties: Conflicts, Proactive Disclosure and S 181 of the Corporations Act. Gerner-Beuerle, C., Paech, P. and Schuster, E.P., 2013. Study on directors duties and liability.